Fw: [odf-discuss] Microsoft's implementation of ODF 1.1

marbux marbux at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 04:05:39 EST 2009


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Jean Hollis Weber <jeanweber at gmail.com> wrote:
> marbux wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jean Hollis Weber <jeanweber at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All 3 parts arrived here within a few minutes of each other (last night,
>>> my
>>> time), and you've probably found that all are now in the archives.
>>
>> Thanks, Jean. Since you received them I won't resend. But the last two
>> parts are still not showing in the archives.
>>
>> <http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2009-January/thread.html>.
>> I suspect they'll show up one of these days. :-) Like I said, the time
>> it takes for posts to show up in the archives is really erratic.
>
> Yes, they are there in the archives, just not properly threaded with the
> earlier discussion.
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2009-January/007834.html
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2009-January/007835.html

Ah, I must have mistitled them. Thanks.

Best regards,

Paul

-- 
Universal Interoperability Council
<http:www.universal-interop-council.org>


More information about the odf-discuss mailing list