Fw: [odf-discuss] Microsoft's implementation of ODF 1.1
marbux at gmail.com
Mon Jan 12 09:58:00 EST 2009
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, <robert_weir at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> odf-discuss-bounces at opendocumentfellowship.com wrote on 01/12/2009
> 06:28:31 AM:
>> Please respond to ODF Discussion List
>> Resending in 3 parts over the next few minutes because Mailman has
>> been choking on the length.
> Probably a good sign that the discussion is not appropriate for a list.
> Might make an interesting essay, though, to post on the web or whatever,
> if you can tighten up the argument and consider multiple perspectives.
I've been leaving the other perspectives up to you. :-) It's mostly
from a pile of research I've been putting together for a series of
articles. But I'm not sure the second two parts have made their way
through yet. They're still not showing in the archives. OTOH, I've
noticed before that Mailman is much quicker about serving mail than it
is about archiving posts and that the amount of time before posts
appear in the archives seems highly variable.
If the other two parts don't make it into the archives by tonight,
I'll resend unless someone fires a flare to let me know that they
Universal Interoperability Council
More information about the odf-discuss