[odf-discuss] Abiword gets requests for OOXML, not ODF
Ian Lynch
ian.lynch at zmsl.com
Fri May 16 04:32:42 EDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 07:18 +0100, Chris Puttick wrote:
> Cool. So we should not bother with standards because entrenched
> monopolies are going to control what happens anyway? My attempt in
> summarising your post - I see little else to draw from it. Apart from
> maybe some vague indications of the superiority of MOO-XML versus
> ODF-XML. Which confuses me, as the XML part of MOO is definitely
> poorer and harder to access than ODF due to its poor readability and
> incomplete references, and the rest of the capacity to
> post/pre-process is basically equal as a zipped container of objects
> including text.
>
> So should we bother with standards or not?
We definitely should and if nothng else, odf has shifted the agenda from
proprietary .doc to XML openly documented formats. That alone is a major
improvement. Perfection is rarely attainable, improvement is.
Ian
--
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org
You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list