[odf-discuss] Burton Group study

[robert_weir at us.ibm.com]

There have been a few good responses to this report.

You've probably seen the blog entry that  Erwin Tenhumberg (Sun) did last 
week:    http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/dispelling_myths_around_odf

Also, Ryan Paul was critical of the report as well in this Ars Technica 
piece:  
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080114-analyst-group-slams-odf-downplays-microsoft-iso-abuses.html

The latest is from the ODF Alliance, just out now, a detailed, 
page-by-page rebuttal of the report:   
http://www.odfalliance.org/resources/BurtonGroupResponseFinal.pdf

And the best bad coverage goes to Pravda, where the 2nd page of their 
article is a verbatim dump from the ODF Wikipedia article. 

http://english.pravda.ru/news/science/15-01-2008/103431-document_formats-0

-Rob

odf-discuss-bounces at opendocumentfellowship.com wrote on 01/15/2008 
05:11:41 AM:

> Chris Puttick wrote:
> > Are we going to respond to this? Seems deliberatively provocative and
> > short-sighted to the extreme, ...
> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1107&tag=nl.e550
> 
> For what it's worth, the blog entry is by Mary Jo Foley who has run a
> major MS fan site, Microsoft Watch, for years.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20080116/cf44545e/attachment-0001.htm