[odf-discuss] Response to Andy Updegrove's article about the Foundation

Ian Lynch ian.lynch at zmsl.com
Thu Feb 7 11:56:02 EST 2008


On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:52 +0100, Daniel wrote:
> Rob Weir:
> >> What would be interesting is an examination of standards or
> >> technologies that you believe have provided "universal
> >> interoperability".
> 
> Ian Lynch:
> > I doubt there is any absolutely universal interoperability standard but
> > ASCII for text characters
> 
> And then, it's only good for English and Latin :-)
> Try writing Fuß, übrigens, schön or 日本語 using ASCII.

Yes that's why I said I doubt any standard is universal for all needs.
That means we need extensible standards, not parallel different
standards that try and do the same sort of thing even in subtly
different ways. It's always possible interoperability will break with
some unforeseen (obscure) demand in complex scenarios but again getting
90%, 95%, 99% then 99.9% then 99.999% of use cases working seems like a
reasonable practical strategy.

Ian
-- 
New QCA Accredited IT Qualifications
www.theINGOTs.org

You have received this email from the following company: The Learning
Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79
8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. 





More information about the odf-discuss mailing list