April 2008 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Apr 1 04:45:40 EDT 2008
Ending: Wed Apr 30 04:30:44 EDT 2008
Messages: 154

• [odf-discuss] Reversing Loss, Microsoft Wins Open-Format Designation   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Computer experts stage street protest in Oslo - Int'l Herald Tribune   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Cute photo   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] MS strategy for the near future   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] IBM on ODF   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Promoting ODF in Chinese   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Slashdot - storing data for 1000 years   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Computer experts stage street protest in Oslo - Int'l Herald Tribune   Alberto Barrionuevo
• [odf-discuss] Fwd: Brazil: What will be the biggest Linux deployment in the World... with ODF... :o)   Alberto Barrionuevo
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   Hanssens Bart
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   Hanssens Bart
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   Alexandro Colorado
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   Alexandro Colorado
• [odf-discuss] Come Join My Network at Diigo   Gary Edwards
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Philippines   Prof. Rom Feria
• [odf-discuss] Computer experts stage street protest in Oslo - Int'l Herald Tribune   Rommel Feria
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   M. Fioretti
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   M. Fioretti
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   M. Fioretti
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft quietly offering ad-funded Works   Bart Hanssens
• [odf-discuss] ODF Validator   Bart Hanssens
• [odf-discuss] ISO to announce Microsoft Open XML result Wednesday   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] ISO approval: A good process gone bad   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Reversing Loss, Microsoft Wins Open-Format Designation   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] OOo marketing   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] CEO   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] ODF Monogram on opendocument.xml.org   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Nibbling at the Edges   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft quietly offering ad-funded Works   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft quietly offering ad-funded Works   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] JTC 1 ballot results leaked?   Michiel Leenaars
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Re: Curtains for Windows? Was: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] More anti-competitive rumblings in the EU about MS   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] MIcrosoft come unstuck in Newham.   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft quietly offering ad-funded Works   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] Please digg   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Sander Marechal
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   Sander Marechal
• [odf-discuss] Official Results Leaked   Carlos Moffat
• [odf-discuss] Reversing Loss, Microsoft Wins Open-Format Designation   Carlos Moffat
• [odf-discuss] ISO confirms approval of OOXML, gives two months to appeal   Carlos Moffat
• [odf-discuss] PDF/A generation (slightly OT)   Maximilian Odendahl
• [odf-discuss] Croatian CSI accepted ODF as a national standard   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Thailand   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] ISO confirms approval of OOXML, gives two months to appeal   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] OOXML critics: ISO approval demonstrates the need for reform   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft wins this OOXML battle, but loses the war   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] BE, NL: governments will not use ISO OOXML   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] UKUUG seeks legal advice on BSI's OOXML decision   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Computer experts stage street protest in Oslo - Int'l Herald Tribune   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Equador goes FOSS   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] ODF is now a Brazilian Standard: NBR ISO/IEC 26300   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] South Africa Adopts ODF as a National Standard   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Deploying KDE to 52 million young people - OFF TOPIC   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Oslo Protest   Simon Phipps
• [odf-discuss] OOo marketing   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] PDF/A generation (slightly OT)   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
• [odf-discuss] MS strategy for the near future   Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   Inge Wallin
• [odf-discuss] Keeping a sense of humour in the world   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] ISO to announce Microsoft Open XML result Wednesday   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Thank you all.   andy
• [odf-discuss] France switches vote... to Abstain (and Japan to Yes)   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ISO to announce Microsoft Open XML result Wednesday   marbux
• [odf-discuss] New Gmail feature -- Gmail Custom Time   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Philippines switches from "no" to "yes" on OOXML approval   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: Philippines switches from "no" to "yes" on OOXML approval   marbux
• [odf-discuss] JTC 1 ballot results leaked?   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Official Results Leaked   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ISO confirms approval of OOXML, gives two months to appeal   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ISO confirms approval of OOXML, gives two months to appeal   marbux
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML critics: ISO approval demonstrates the need for reform   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Becta's response to the approval of Office Open XML   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OpenDocument v. 1.2 out for public review in May, South Africa says   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Whether to allow DOC for JTC 1 documents being considered   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: Member of EU Parliament asks if Microsoft should be excluded from public procurement   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] English translation/transcript of Steve Pepper's speech in Oslo   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Cute photo   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Cute photo   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ISO backs Microsoft position that competing standards are a good thing   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   marbux
• [odf-discuss] WordPerfect X4 released   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: WordPerfect X4 released   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: WordPerfect X4 released   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML and Office 2007 Conformance: a Smoke Test   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: OOXML and Office 2007 Conformance: a Smoke Test   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Immature file formats should be kept inside   marbux
• [odf-discuss] First impression of ODT support in WordPerfect X4   marbux
• [odf-discuss] We'll be hearing more like this   marbux
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] IBM responds to OOXML approval   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] Private deal to approve OOXML? More evidence surfaces   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] Promoting ODF in Chinese   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] ODF Validator   robert_weir at us.ibm.com
• [odf-discuss] We'll be hearing more like this   robert_weir at us.ibm.com

Last message date: Wed Apr 30 04:30:44 EDT 2008
Archived on: Wed Apr 30 04:30:29 EDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...