[odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step
robert_weir at us.ibm.com
robert_weir at us.ibm.com
Mon Apr 14 14:18:23 EDT 2008
Sorry Paul, but now you are conflating the Law with your interpretation of
the Law. What I am saying is that if your interpretation of the law,
which I hear being expressed by no other competent authority, is at odds
with all evident practice in standardization, then I must pause and wonder
whether your interpretation is correct. My doubt need not be grounded on
any legal analysis. It is sufficient, to me at least, to observe that
your interpretation does not appear to be widely held.
Of course, that doesn't prove anything. Absence of evidence is not
evidence of absence. I could be wrong. But you must admit that your
interpretation is just a wee bit less persuasive in light of the fact that
no court or competent regulatory body has ever ruled on your line of
reasoning, and thousands of existing standards seemingly violate it?
As for your question, you asked whether I will "clearly and unambiguously
specify that conformance requirements essential to achieve the
interoperability" and will the standards-based interoperability between
*different* IT systems be "demonstrable," as required by JTC 1 Directives?
To that I can say that we are rewriting the conformance clauses in ODF
1.2, per OASIS requirements. I believe this also accords well with the
JTC1 requirements. But honestly, I also believe that what we have in ODF
1.0 also complies with JTC1 requirements. In other words, I don't believe
that the JTC1 requirements prevent a standard from defining conformance in
a way that allows conformant applications from also allowing vendor
extensions.
In any case, I am very serious about interoperability. But I believe that
vendor extensions are an insignificant source of real-world
interoperability problems when it comes to ODF. The real-world issues are
more around partial implementations, or defective interpretations of the
standard. So that's where I put my efforts. If any one else is
interested in helping to solve the real-world problems, then I'd recommend
the same.
-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20080414/75261c99/attachment.htm
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list