[odf-discuss] OOXML: The next step
mfioretti at nexaima.net
Tue Apr 8 11:30:07 EDT 2008
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 09:12:42 AM -0400, robert_weir at us.ibm.com wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> Your proposal is an "OpenFile" mark which could be applied to
> documents that are free from such extensions. This appears not to
> be against all extensions per-se, but only against those that are
> undocumented or have restrictive licensing. Governments, etc.,
> could require or prefer documents with such a mark, and applications
> which are capable of producing them.
> One difference is that my proposal would be part of the standard, in
> the conformance clause, while yours would be a separate program.
> Other difference is in the treatment of patent-encumbered
> extensions. Your proposal would forbid them. My proposal would
> allow them, if they were documented.
that's because, as you yourself say, our two proposals aren't mutually
exclusive: they work at different levels, exactly because, to use your
> Typically a technical standard places requirements only on tangible
> properties and behaviors of the applications.
I agree with this way of working and I don't want it to change, as I
wrote it in my papers.
> I'm not saying that is a bad thing, but I think it would need
> resources behind it similar to the launch of a new open source
of course. I said "I'd like to write more, or work, on similar
projects" just because I'm well aware an "OpenFile" initiative of this
kind could never be a one-man, volunteer show. But if enough players
start to partner...
> And remember at a future ODF 1.2 BRM, Microsoft could get
> such a clause watered-down ("shall" becomes "should" or "may") or
> removed altogether in 30 seconds, with the strength they have in ISO
all the more reasons to consider an "OpenFile" initiative as part of a
"next step", aren't they? If Microsoft can control the current
technical standard bodies, let's attack from another front too.
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you: http://digifreedom.net/node/84
More information about the odf-discuss