September 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Sat Sep 1 05:16:55 EDT 2007
Ending: Sun Sep 30 21:09:03 EDT 2007
Messages: 237

• [odf-discuss] Missing article "Open standards 'essential to Europe's IT future'"Tom Espiner. ZDNet UK. (2006)   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [Marketing] Interesting news-update]   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Ballot irregularities   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] major ODF v. MOOX (aka OOXML) on Slashdot   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Help please!   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] EU Recommendations on Open Formats from PEGSCO on 6 Dec 2006   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Apple petition   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Apple petition   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Redmond Developer News article on ODF   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Redmond Developer News article on ODF   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Google presentations   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Google presentations   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Fwd: You see, that's why we need ODF so badly   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft and Java at ISO   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Lars Noodén
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Lars Noodén
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Wall Street Journal discusses Microsoft packing of standardization bodies.   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] ISO irregularities in more light (former Yugoslavia)   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Round tripping   Lars Noodén
• [odf-discuss] Help please!   Søren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Help please!   Søren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Søren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Søren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Vietnam finally getting on the band wagon?   Damon Anderson
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Damon Anderson
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   Damon Anderson
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Damon Anderson
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   Jerry Askew
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: nice little standard? (Pic)   Jerry Askew
• [odf-discuss] Fwd: What's up in Brazil WRT Microsoft vs Free Software, or the longest couple of weeks ever   Alberto Barrionuevo
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Alex Brown
• [odf-discuss] Missing article "Open standards 'essential to Europe's IT future'"Tom Espiner. ZDNet UK. (2006)   Thomas Butter
• [odf-discuss] enhanced-path question   Thomas Butter
• [odf-discuss] enhanced-path question   Thomas Butter
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Mike Carden
• [odf-discuss] National Archives of Australia releases Xena 4.0   Mike Carden
• [odf-discuss] Away for 12 days.   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Away for 12 days.   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] More "No" votes   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Re: [odf-members] Re: Impending loss of Fellowship's .org domain name   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] Novell's Michael Meeks on ODF   Daniel Carrera
• [odf-discuss] major ODF v. MOOX (aka OOXML) on Slashdot   Alexandro Colorado
• [odf-discuss] Google no likey OOXML, very pro ODF   Alexandro Colorado
• [odf-discuss] Novell's Michael Meeks on ODF   Alexandro Colorado
• [odf-discuss] Australia give Abstain vote   Jonathon Coombes
• [odf-discuss] Metadata issues in ODF   Matthew Cruickshank
• [odf-discuss] Away for 12 days.   Matthew Cruickshank
• [odf-discuss] Yet another vote visualizer ... but this time you can tweak the results   Matthew Cruickshank
• [odf-discuss] Announcing ISO-Vote.com (for the second time)   Matthew Cruickshank
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Matthew Cruickshank
• [odf-discuss] Denmark will vote NO   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] major ODF v. MOOX (aka OOXML) on Slashdot   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] major ODF v. MOOX (aka OOXML) on Slashdot   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Google no likey OOXML, very pro ODF   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Google no likey OOXML, very pro ODF   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] OT -- please give Digg support to a big desktop FOSS advocate   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Novell's Michael Meeks on ODF   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Novell's Michael Meeks on ODF   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Apology and proposal for moving forward from the personal attack issue   Christian Einfeldt
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   M. Fioretti
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   M. Fioretti
• [odf-discuss] And here is the Danish vote ...   John Gotze
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Andreas J. Guelzow
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Screen saver slide with ISO theme   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Pete Harlow
• [odf-discuss] Missing article "Open standards 'essential to Europe's IT future'"Tom Espiner. ZDNet UK. (2006)   Janet Hawtin
• [odf-discuss] Australia give Abstain vote   Janet Hawtin
• [odf-discuss] Working for Standards by Lauren Wood 09/07/2007 (OReilly)   Janet Hawtin
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Janet Hawtin
• [odf-discuss] Re: [Noooxml] Microsoft and Java at ISO   Pieter Hintjens
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Pieter Hintjens
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Pieter Hintjens
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] Novell's Michael Meeks on ODF   Pamela Jones
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Sigrid Kronenberger
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Sigrid Kronenberger
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   Sigrid Kronenberger
• [odf-discuss] More "No" votes   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [Marketing] Interesting news-update]   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: ODF European action Group Plan for next 6 months Appeal for Papers]   Ian Lynch
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: ODF European action Group Plan for next 6 months Appeal for Papers]   Ian Lynch
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Ian Lynch
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Nicolas Mailhot
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Maximilian Odendahl
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Maximilian Odendahl
• [odf-discuss] Denmark will vote NO   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Very late ISO clarifies: If you have comments you must vote disapproval   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Website has info on Ballet Comments   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] IBM joins OOo Community   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] OOXML: nice little standard? (Pic)   Russell Ossendryver
• [odf-discuss] Journalist Update   D.C. Parris
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Nicolas Pettiaux
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Nicolas Pettiaux
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Nicolas Pettiaux
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Nicolas Pettiaux
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   Nicolas Pettiaux
• [odf-discuss] Website has info on Ballet Comments   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Ballot irregularities   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Help please!   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Help please!   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Re: Help please!   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Apple petition   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Apple petition   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Fwd: You see, that's why we need ODF so badly   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] IT Week article   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Chris Puttick
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Ric
• [odf-discuss] Metadata issues in ODF   Soren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Re: ODF 1.2 metadata   Soren Roug
• [odf-discuss] enhanced-path question   Soren Roug
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Andy Trevor
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Andy Trevor
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Andy Trevor
• [odf-discuss] Re: [odf-members] Re: Impending loss of Fellowship's .org domain name   Andy Trevor
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Promotion site   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   Peter Vandenabeele
• [odf-discuss] Website has info on Ballet Comments   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Google presentations   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Lotus Symphony: ODF-based office suite from IBM   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Thank you for the card   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Fellowship server out again - now rebooted   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Flaming (was: A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition)   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Impending loss of Fellowship's .org domain name   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Website downtime problems   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Re: Impending loss of Fellowship's .org domain name   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   Jean Hollis Weber
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [Marketing] Interesting news-update]   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Website has info on Ballet Comments   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Vietnam finally getting on the band wagon?   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Doug Mahugh at TechEd 07   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Apple petition   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft and Java at ISO   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Netherlands Picks ODF   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] Microsoft and Java at ISO   Yoon Kit Yong
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   Ana Young
• [odf-discuss] Denmark will vote NO   Mateusz Zasuwik
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   arebenti at web.de
• [odf-discuss] Fwd: What's up in Brazil WRT Microsoft vs Free Software, or the longest couple of weeks ever   marbux
• [odf-discuss] [Fwd: Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML]   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Ballot irregularities   marbux
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Website has info on Ballet Comments   marbux
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Doug Mahugh at TechEd 07   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Should we mention "Microsoft Office + Sun plug-in" as an "ODF supporting" application ?   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Reminder: September 17 is decision day day in European Commission v. Microsoft   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Summary of Court of First Instance decision in Commission v. Microsoft   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ODF adoption -- Netherlands   marbux
• [Noooxml] [odf-discuss] URGENT: Support threatened open standards in Europe before Sept 15, 2007   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Wall Street Journal discusses Microsoft packing of standardization bodies.   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNOR position   marbux
• [odf-discuss] ODF support -- TeamDrive   marbux
• [odf-discuss] procedure at ISO Ballot Resolution Meeting   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   marbux
• [odf-discuss] RE: Trolls   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Re: Round tripping   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for Moderation of ODF discussion list   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Proposal for moderation rules   marbux
• [odf-discuss] Apology and proposal for moving forward from the personal attack issue   marbux

Last message date: Sun Sep 30 21:09:03 EDT 2007
Archived on: Wed Mar 12 06:43:06 EDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...