[odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition

[marbux]

On 9/25/07, Maximilian Odendahl <info at sept-solutions.de> wrote:
>
>  Hi marbux, everyone,
>
> >>--featureful applications. ODF does not. ODF has virtually no
> conformance
> >> requirements beyond validation and allows implementations to destroy
> metadata
> >>created by other implementations, discretion that Sun has fully
> exploited in StarOffice
> >> and OOo to ensure that its apps remain the center of the ODF universe.
>
> just by repeating this does not make it more true. Everyone interested in
> the true story, including why it is not even possible to always keep foreign
> meta data, please read the TC emails. If I recall it correctly, several
> others on this list have written the same and asked to stop making these
> false statements, so please do so.
>

Yes, please do read the TC emails because what I said is true. Had you read
them yourself, you would not be saying what you just did. You are taking
sides rather than doing your homework. You should be asking the others to
stop making false statements, not me.


BUCK "MARBUX" MARTIN
  Director of Legal Affairs
  OpenDocument Foundation
  Contact:
<http://www.opendocumentfoundation.us/contact.htm>
-- Universal Interop Now!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070925/747cc606/attachment-0001.html