[odf-discuss] A bit more detailed explanation of the AFNORposition

[Daniel Carrera]

Thanks Max. Personally I'm tired of hearing this rant from Marbux. 
Marbux's claims have been throughly debunked by a lot of people who 
actually know ODF and actually have ODF implementations in the market. 
At some point one starts to get tired of debunking the exact same claims 
over and over.

Maximilian Odendahl wrote:
> Hi marbux, everyone,
>  
>  >>--featureful applications. ODF does not. ODF has virtually no conformance
>  >> requirements beyond validation and allows implementations to destroy 
> metadata
>  >>created by other implementations, discretion that Sun has fully 
> exploited in StarOffice
>  >> and OOo to ensure that its apps remain the center of the ODF universe.
>  
> just by repeating this does not make it more true. Everyone interested 
> in the true story, including why it is not even possible to always keep 
> foreign meta data, please read the TC emails. If I recall it correctly, 
> several others on this list have written the same and asked to stop 
> making these false statements, so please do so.
>  
> Regards
> Max
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss