[odf-discuss] Novell forks OOo

[Daniel Carrera]

http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/

Echoes my own experiences at OOo. I know exactly how this guy feels.

Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Michael Meeks:
> 
> "Marveled at Slashdot's inflation of the go-oo.org mess; a few points
> 
>    * This is hardly a fork - and it's not even something very new in 
> practical terms. As I said very clearly, we're still contributing the 
> majority of our work to Sun, (and hence OO.o) under the JCA, and will 
> continue doing so for the bits that touch their code."
> 
> http://www.gnome.org/~michael/activity.html#2007-10-03
> 
> 
> marbux wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/3/07, *Daniel Carrera* <daniel.carrera at zmsl.com 
>> <mailto:daniel.carrera at zmsl.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     marbux wrote:
>>      > <http://slashdot.org/articles/07/10/03/1212234.shtml>
>>
>>     My opinion: Serves them right. I don't like the way Sun runs OOo.
>>
>>     Maybe Novell's fork will pay more attention to the ODF test suite 
>> too.
>>
>> IBM also made some loud noises about changes needed in OOo governance 
>> when it jumped into OOo development. Of course I won't be happy until 
>> OOo acquires Reveal Codes or at least a source page editor.
>>
>>
>> BUCK "MARBUX" MARTIN
>>   Director of Legal Affairs
>>   OpenDocument Foundation
>>   Contact:
>> <http://www.opendocumentfoundation.us/contact.htm 
>> <http://www.opendocumentfoundation.us/contact.htm>>
>> -- Universal Interop Now!
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> odf-discuss mailing list
>> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
>> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>