[odf-discuss] Fwd: W3C Lead on CDF says OpenDocument Fellowship
Position on CDF Makes No Sense
Ryan Singer
ryan.singer at gmail.com
Fri Nov 9 12:30:29 EST 2007
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <Andrew.Updegrove at gesmer.com>
Date: Nov 9, 2007 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: W3C Lead on CDF says OpenDocument Fellowship Position on
CDF Makes No Sense
To: Ryan.Singer at gmail.com
Ryan,
I sent the correction about twenty minutes ago, but your copy bounced for
some reason.
I've pasted it in below, and hopw that this version will fare better.
Andy
To: Andy Updegrove/Boston at Boston
cc:
Date: 12:08:26 PM Today
Subject: Correction: OpenDocument "Foundation" note "Fellowship"
PLEASE NOTE:
There was a mistake in the subject line of the email I sent a short while
ago: while the email itself and the blog entry to which it links correctly
refers to the "OpenDocument Foundation," the subject line erroneously
referred to the "OpenDocument Fellowship," which does not in any way
endorse the Foundaton's opinions in this matter.
My apologies to the OpenDocument Fellowship for this error.
Andrew Updegrove
Gesmer Updegrove LLP
40 Broad Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
T: 617/350-6800
F: 617/350-6878
www.gesmer.com
www.consortiuminfo.org
"Ryan Singer"
<ryan.singer at gmai
l.com> To
Andrew.Updegrove at gesmer.com
11/09/2007 11:57 cc
AM
Subject
Re: W3C Lead on CDF says
Please respond to OpenDocument Fellowship Position on
Ryan.Singer at gmail CDF Makes No Sense
.com
Andrew,
OpenDocument Fellowship != OpenDocument Foundation. The Fellowship
does not agree with the new direction the foundation has taken. Your
subject line mentions the fellowship, while the rest of your email is
about the foundation. Please send out a correction.
--
Ryan Singer
Co-founder
OpenDocument Fellowship
650-743-2785
On Nov 9, 2007 8:21 AM, <Andrew.Updegrove at gesmer.com> wrote:
>
> Earlier in the week, many technology reporters were wrestling with what
to
> make of the OpenDocument Foundation's announcement that it was abandoning
> support for ODF in favor of CDF, a W3C specification-in-process that few
> had ever heard of, and no one seemed to know much about. Those that did
> examine CDF were left puzzled trying to figure out how it could possibly
> function as an alternative to ODF.
>
> To find out the facts, I interviewed Chris Lilley, the W3C lead for the
CDF
> project, and his answer couldn't have been more clear: "The one thing
I'd
> really want your readers to know is that CDF was not created to be, and
> isn't suitable for use as, an office format." In fact, it isn't even an
> format at all - although it has been matched for export purposes with
> another W3C specification, called WICD - but WICD is a non-editable
format
> intended for viewing only. Moreover, no one from the Foundation has
joined
> W3C, nor explained to W3C what the Foundation's founders have in mind.
>
> It is highly unfortunate that the founders of a tax exempt organization
> that solicited donations, "To support the community of volunteers in
> promoting, improving and providing user assistance for ODF and software
> designed to operate on data in this format," should publicly announce
that
> it believes that ODF will fail. By endorsing a standard that has no
> rational relationship to office formats at all, they can only serve to
> confuse the marketplace and undermine the efforts of the global community
> they claimed to serve.
>
> Further details are here:
>
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20071109070012244
>
> As always, please let me know if you would like to be removed from this
> list.
>
> Andrew Updegrove
> Gesmer Updegrove LLP
> 40 Broad Street
> Boston, Massachusetts 02109
> T: 617/350-6800
> F: 617/350-6878
> www.gesmer.com
> www.consortiuminfo.org
>
>
> *****************************************
> Any tax information or written tax advice contained herein (including any
attachments) is not intended to be and cannot be used by any taxpayer for
the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer.
(The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury
Regulations governing tax practice.)
>
> Electronic mail from Gesmer Updegrove LLP, 40 Broad Street, Boston, MA
02109. Voice: (617) 350-6800, Fax: (617) 350-6878. This communication is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named as the
addressee. It may contain information which is privileged and/or
confidential under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient
or such recipient's employee or agent, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify Christopher O'Sullivan at (617) 350-6800 and notify the
sender by electronic mail. Please expunge this communication without
making any copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
--
_________________
Ryan Singer
*****************************************
Any tax information or written tax advice contained herein (including
any attachments) is not intended to be and cannot be used by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed
on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant to
U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
Electronic mail from Gesmer Updegrove LLP, 40 Broad Street, Boston, MA
02109. Voice: (617) 350-6800, Fax: (617) 350-6878. This communication
is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named as the
addressee. It may contain information which is privileged and/or
confidential under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient or such recipient's employee or agent, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify Christopher
O'Sullivan at (617) 350-6800 and notify the sender by electronic
mail. Please expunge this communication without making any copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
--
_________________
Ryan Singer
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list