[odf-discuss] Gnome Foundation and ECMA

[Russell Ossendryver]

>> GNOME is officially part of Ecma TC 45, whether or not its sponsored
>>representative there physically travels to the meetings, works online or
>> blows the whole thing off.

>I'm sorry but that argument makes no sense.  There are no other
>GNOME representatives.  Jus little ol me.  If I am not
>participating, how is GNOME getting around my obstructionism ?

Perhaps the release should be reviewed by   the Software Freedom Law Center
so as to ensure the best possible protection for Gnome, and restricting any
MS motives using the Gnome name to expoit/use for thier advantage

On 11/3/07, Jeff Waugh <jdub at perkypants.org> wrote:
>
> <quote who="Lars Noodén">
>
> > > wallet == ?
> >
> > Jeff confirmed that GNOME was footing the bill for Ecma TC 45
> > participation.
>
> I really think you need to re-read what has been said on this list. If you
> think I've confirmed that GNOME is footing the bill, you especially need
> to
> re-read the bit about there being absolutely no cost involved whatsoever.
>
> - Jeff
>
> --
> linux.conf.au 2008: Melbourne, Australia
> http://lca2008.linux.org.au/
>
> "Anyway - I need something more James Bond than Banana Man, if you know
>                       what I mean..." - Tom Gilbert
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20071104/13308038/attachment-0001.html