[odf-discuss] Gnome, Ecma,
and what governments (and FOSS?) should have done
worldlabel at gmail.com
Sat Nov 3 13:12:05 EDT 2007
>Actually, there is one set of organisations that could, that could
>handle it, and stage a PR coup at the same time. An ODF
>advocacy/support group could sponsor me to join ECMA in the dual
>role of clarifying MOOX and acting as a liaison.
>Any offers ?
Interested in knowing more?
On 11/3/07, Jody Goldberg <jody at gnome.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:22:14PM +0100, Alberto Barrionuevo wrote:
> > One thing is that ECMA committee is composed by Microsoft and its backers
> > (Intel, Apple, Novell, etc.)
> To characterise Novell as a Microsoft backer is grossly unfair to my
> ex-colleagues. They have contributed a massive body of work to
> OO.o, improving and advocating it.
> > "OOXML is an open standard with many and competitive
> > implementations" (what remains false, because actually only
> > MS-Office implements it... and badly in the case of the DIS 29500
> > or ECMA-376 versions of the specification).
> They can already cite the Apple, and Word-perfect filters for that.
> Which I suspect has significantly better name recognition than
> > So Jody joining officially in the name of Gnome of course that is helping to
> > Microsoft to get its ISO. And an ISO for OOXML means severe problems for ODF.
> That depends entirely on how we look at it.
> 1) We are not helping explicitly. As stated previously we are
> not taking part in the issue resolution.
> 2) We're not helping implicitly by writing the filters. There are
> already commercial efforts that probably had more development
> time than the few days Gnumeric has seen.
> 3) MS was forced to promote it's spec as the MS Office file format.
> It is not being promoted as 'the' format for office suites. That
> would be problem. I do not see MOOX as a severe threat to ODF,
> with or without an ISO imprimatur. MS was forced to acknowledge
> that they serve different goals.
> > Different would be that Jody joins via another entity not as important in the
> > free software world as Gnome. I would see no any problem on that approach,
> > since he could get the interoperability information he looks for in the same
> > way. But Microsoft wants/needs to Gnome in the team, not any other.
> Not unreasonable. I chose GNOME because of my strong ties to the
> organisation, and because of our community focus on just making
> things work for our users.
> Unfortunately there is likely to be a small 'not in my backyard'
> problem. What organisation of any importance is going to welcome
> taking on the role of community whipping boy of the week ?
> "Hi my name is Jody, and I'd like join your organisation and
> have it sponsor my participation in causing 'severe problems'
> for ODF"
> There aren't likely to be many takers.
> Actually, there is one set of organisations that could, that could
> handle it, and stage a PR coup at the same time. An ODF
> advocacy/support group could sponsor me to join ECMA in the dual
> role of clarifying MOOX and acting as a liaison.
> Any offers ?
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
More information about the odf-discuss