[odf-discuss] Gnome Foundation and ECMA
jody at gnome.org
Sat Nov 3 10:42:30 EDT 2007
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 01:27:20PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> Read it again. I did not say that Jody is participating in that part of
> the process. He himself even recently clarified that.
> What I am saying is that GNOME is participating. I see the name on the
> Ecma list for TC45:
> Ecma TC 45 is currently working towards hammering MOOX through ISO.
> GNOME is officially part of Ecma TC 45, whether or not its sponsored
> representative there physically travels to the meetings, works online or
> blows the whole thing off.
I'm sorry but that argument makes no sense. There are no other
GNOME representatives. Jus little ol me. If I am not
participating, how is GNOME getting around my obstructionism ?
> PS. If GNOME is not backing MOOX, then just put that out in the open
> with a position statement. Further, it wouldn't hurt to withdraw from
> Ecma TC45 until such time as participation becomes relevant to the
> purported claims of documenting the specification.
Neither GNOME nor I is 'backing' MOOX.
We do not advocate that users adopt it.
We do not prefer it to ODF.
> The sqirming and worming
Where are we squirming ? This is as clear as I know how to
be. There is no ulterior motive, or hidden intent.
More information about the odf-discuss