[odf-discuss] Missing info in the validator?

[Roman Fordinal]

Hi Marco,

Thanx for report, I want to add support for ODF 1.1 validation in online 
validation service soon.

Marco Fioretti wrote:
> I don't know if this is related to what Daniel says below.
> Probably it isn't, in the sense that the problem is in
> the validator and not in OO.o Anyway:
> 
> Daniel wrote:
> 
>> Lars says:
>>> Just to be clear, does that mean that StarOffice and OpenOffice.org 
>>> do not yet create ODF-compliant documents?  If so, could you please 
>>> point to specific details?
>> I second Lars' request for specifity. I'm not aware of any instance
>> where OOo produces an invalid document.
> 
> If you load in the online odf validator the document I mentioned last week in the
> "Bug in the ODF viewer" message to this list:
> 
> http://politicadelsoftware.openlabs.it/files/regione-lombardia-pdl-software-libero.odt
> 
> you get:
> 
> Output of validation test file 'regione-lombardia-pdl-software-libero.odt'
> This file is not Valid OpenDocument 1.0!
> 
>    1. error
>       in content.xml
>       Element text has extra content: sequence-decls
> 
> I assume (hope :-) ) that this is not a problem with OO.o, but something much less
> problematic, for example that the file is ODF 1.1. If so, it would be useful to add
> in the validator page a warning explaining, _before_ you upload the file, that it
> can only handle files generated with OO.o up to version 1.x (4? 5?)
> 
> If this isn't the case, info on what caused the problem is welcome. Ditto for the odf viewer bug, btw.
> 
> Ciao,
> Marco
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss


-- 
Roman Fordinal
head of development

~    * +421 905 400 016
~    * roman.fordinal at comsultia.com
~    * jabber: rfordinal at jabbim.sk
~    * mlynske nivy 8, 811 09 bratislava
~    * slovakia
~    * http://www.comsultia.com