[odf-discuss] Missing info in the validator?
roman.fordinal at comsultia.com
Mon May 28 09:29:08 EDT 2007
Thanx for report, I want to add support for ODF 1.1 validation in online
validation service soon.
Marco Fioretti wrote:
> I don't know if this is related to what Daniel says below.
> Probably it isn't, in the sense that the problem is in
> the validator and not in OO.o Anyway:
> Daniel wrote:
>> Lars says:
>>> Just to be clear, does that mean that StarOffice and OpenOffice.org
>>> do not yet create ODF-compliant documents? If so, could you please
>>> point to specific details?
>> I second Lars' request for specifity. I'm not aware of any instance
>> where OOo produces an invalid document.
> If you load in the online odf validator the document I mentioned last week in the
> "Bug in the ODF viewer" message to this list:
> you get:
> Output of validation test file 'regione-lombardia-pdl-software-libero.odt'
> This file is not Valid OpenDocument 1.0!
> 1. error
> in content.xml
> Element text has extra content: sequence-decls
> I assume (hope :-) ) that this is not a problem with OO.o, but something much less
> problematic, for example that the file is ODF 1.1. If so, it would be useful to add
> in the validator page a warning explaining, _before_ you upload the file, that it
> can only handle files generated with OO.o up to version 1.x (4? 5?)
> If this isn't the case, info on what caused the problem is welcome. Ditto for the odf viewer bug, btw.
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
head of development
~ * +421 905 400 016
~ * roman.fordinal at comsultia.com
~ * jabber: rfordinal at jabbim.sk
~ * mlynske nivy 8, 811 09 bratislava
~ * slovakia
~ * http://www.comsultia.com
More information about the odf-discuss