[odf-discuss] ODF adoption considered in Oregon

[marbux]

On 3/29/07, Alex Hudson <alex at stratagia.co.uk> wrote:
> marbux wrote:
> > Alex, on Sun's title for its covenant, it is common for covenants not
> > to sue to have different titles.
>
> I'm well aware of that.
>
> You'll appreciate that making it obvious that we weren't talking about
> the MS CNS is useful from the point of view of clarity, though. Clearly
> the title of the document itself doesn't make any difference.
>

Right, it's what is in the text that is important, albeit I've read a
few cases where the judges buttressed their interpretation of the text
with their interpretation of the document title. And I appreciate any
clarity anyone can offer in this crazy, mixed-up world. :-)