[odf-discuss] ODF adoption considered in Oregon

[Thomas Zander]

On Thursday 29 March 2007 10:14, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> > ... That's a "legal restriction." The same defect, and others, are in
> > the Minnesota, Texas, and California bills.
>
> Thinking a little more about it, it may be just a case of having
> difficulty expressing in writing what they want and using specialized
> vocabulary that isn't first nature to most politicians.

Most probably; which is why I think someone with a lawyer background, like 
Marbux is the idea person to go there and say: "What you wrote, is that what 
you mean? If not, lets work together to make it say what you really mean".

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070329/e3016f1c/attachment-0001.pgp