[odf-discuss] Rick Jelliffe FUD?

[Chris Puttick]

Not allegedly, admittedly! But Rick Jeliffe is more of an issue
because his due discreditation has not taken place publically enough.
Not the Wikipedia incident but using his "independent" status to carry
lies into newsprint.

On the otherhand, the Bangkok Post needs a formal letter as failure to
seek a second opinion on Rick's appallingly misinformed opinions. The
question that needs to be asked, in public, loudly and often is just
what is MS offering Rick to spout such rubbish?

Chris

On 17/06/07, Jonathon Coombes <jon at cybersite.com.au> wrote:
>
> On 18/06/2007, at 2:28 AM, Yoon Kit Yong wrote:
>
> > His statements.
> >
> > http://www.bangkokpost.net/130607_Database/13Jun2007_data04.php
> >
> > Coincidentally he spoke about dates. This called for a response.
> >
> > http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/06/rick_jelliffe_m.html
>
> I am interested in this article regarding Rick Jelliffe, but I must
> say I find it very hard to take anything he says as valuable when
> things like the following allegedly happened:
>
> http://www.theage.com.au/news/web/microsoft-bid-to-doctor-wikipedia/
> 2007/01/24/1169594329590.html
>
> Regards
> Jonathon
>
> --------------------------
> Jonathon Coombes
> OOo Knowledgebase:-  http://mindmeld.cybersite.com.au
> http://www.cybersite.com.au
> http://www.training4linux.com
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>


-- 
My employers website: http://thehumanjourney.net - opinions in this
email are however very much my own and may not reflect that of my
current employer, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc..