[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

[Thomas Zander]

On Saturday 02 June 2007 12:34:55 marbux wrote:
> But you omit the fact that you were not always in that "vast majority,"
> that you admitted the list amendment introduced an incompatibility

what incompatibility?

Can you explain the usecase where there is going to be a problem. Step by 
step, please. Don't assume I understand 'the obvious'.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070603/d64cbfe0/attachment-0001.pgp