[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

[Thomas Zander]

On Saturday 02 June 2007 21:12:03 marbux wrote:
> > Interresting, then what _were_ you saying?
> >
> I'll answer that question right after you answer my question about
> that round-trip use case I mentioned

hmm, I can answer that only if I know what you don't understand with my 
repeated previous explanations.
Don't get me wrong; I am open to explaining what I mean and very open to 
arguments that don't fit my world view. But obviously I need to 
understand the arguments before I can respond or otherwise act on them.

So, as Daniel said, your request simple stops this thread dead in its 
tracks as I can't react to your position if I don't understand your 
position except to honestly say (again) I don't see any problems.

Also note; that insulting me by insinuating that I am being dishonest in 
my communication is a very good way to make me stop caring about your 
position.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070603/2d6c3b11/attachment-0001.pgp