[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?
Daniel
daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Sat Jun 2 17:08:37 EDT 2007
marbux wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Thomas Zander <zander at kde.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday 02 June 2007 14:40:51 marbux wrote:
>> > > Marbux, does this mean that your beef with the proposal is that it
>> > > adds a feature to ODF that MS Word doesn't have?
>>
>> > No. That was Thomas' characterization.
>>
>> Interresting, then what _were_ you saying?
>>
> I'll answer that question right after you answer my question about that
> round-trip use case I mentioned, the use case just quoted by Daniel at the
> end of his post.
So you refuse to tell us what you are saying until Thomas can respond to
what you are saying? You don't see a problem with that? You posed a
scenario that comes down to having an issue with a feature being added
to ODF that is not present in MS Office. I said as much and you replied
that that's not what you said. Ok, so what _did_ you say? And you reply
that you'll only tell us what you said after we've replied. This is
bewildering.
> You very effectively and rudely ended our prior conversation with
> your subsequent bald denials that there was any incompatibility involved.
Because you are never rude in emails, right?
> My question regarding the use case was:
>
> "How does the WW IMBR list tuple get back to WW IMBR without resorting to
> application level hacks, using only the markup provided in the ODF
> 1.2specification as modified by the lists amendment?"
In other words, your beef is that ODF 1.2 will have a feature that you
can't deal with.
> Intending no disrespect to those so afflicted, I do not believe I am
> conversing with someone who suffers from Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity
> Disorder. KWord is strong testimony that you do not have that
> disability. Am
> I wrong? If I am, then you will need to provide me with a communications
> protocol that accommodates your disability.
I thought you were opposed to ad hominem attacks and personal insults.
As far as I can see in this thread all insults have come from you
Marbux. Please try to offer people a minimum of respect. As you well
know, throwing insults and ad hominems only suggests to the audience
that you have no real position.
Daniel.
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list