[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

[marbux]

On 6/2/07, Thomas Zander <zander at kde.org> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 02 June 2007 14:40:51 marbux wrote:
> > > Marbux, does this mean that your beef with the proposal is that it
> > > adds a feature to ODF that MS Word doesn't have?
>
> > No. That was Thomas' characterization.
>
> Interresting, then what _were_ you saying?
>
> I'll answer that question right after you answer my question about that
round-trip use case I mentioned, the use case just quoted by Daniel at the
end of his post. I see little use in discussing this issue with you if you
are determined to continue ignoring that which you forthrightly recognized
before. You very effectively and rudely ended our prior conversation with
your subsequent bald denials that there was any incompatibility involved. I
do not intend to waste the bits it takes to answer your question unless you
first show me some proof that you now wish to have a candid discussion.

My question regarding the use case was:

"How does the WW IMBR list tuple get back to WW IMBR without resorting to
application level hacks, using only the markup provided in the ODF
1.2specification as modified by the lists amendment?"

>> Can you summarize so someone with a much shorter >>attention span can
follow?  I.e. in about 30 words.

Intending no disrespect to those so afflicted, I do not believe I am
conversing with someone who suffers from Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder. KWord is strong testimony that you do not have that disability. Am
I wrong? If I am, then you will need to provide me with a communications
protocol that accommodates your disability.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070602/7630bc6f/attachment-0001.html