[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

[Daniel]

marbux wrote:
>> Marbux, does this mean that your beef with the proposal is that it adds
>> a feature to ODF that MS Word doesn't have?
>>
> No. That was Thomas' characterization.

That is the message I gather from your statements:

For all: WW = "Windows Word"

Thomas> WW has a 2 key model, with this vote ODF has a 3 key model.
Thomas> So its simple to emulate a 2 key model in a 3 keys one by
Thomas> ignoring one key.

Marbux> Am I wrong that it isn't all one way? The Foundation is working
Marbux> on a plugin ... Won't they have to somehow implement a 3-key
Marbux> model in a 2-day [key] model in their plugins...?
...
Marbux> starting from the problem list tuples of Windows Word ("WW")
Marbux> heading into KWord with its list triples, an ODT 1.0 app with
Marbux> list tuples and back to WW via the foundation plug-in.

Marbux> WW in-memory binary representation > daVinci ODF > KWord > ODT 
1.0 app > da vinci > WW in-memory-binary-representation


In other words, it looks like your beef is that ODF would have a feature 
not present in Windows Word (WW) and that would affect round-tripping 
with the Foundation plugin.

Daniel.