[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

[Thomas Zander]

On Saturday 02 June 2007 00:15:59 marbux wrote:
> > Florian seems to still be posting....
> >
> >     http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200706/msg00003.html
>
> A one-line post does not a participant make and you forget that Florian
> has a dual-status as a Foundation member. Novell is not participating
> on the TC anymore. I know whereof I speak.

In the last 7 months Florian has focussed on Lists as a discussion topic 
only, as have I. The subject is closed and now I am back to the code to 
make the implementation work according to the upcoming 1.2 spec.
I'm sure that for him its similar.

To state that you know whereof you speak is nothing but quite funny, and 
rather sad, really. Your opinions are your own and it would be good to 
accept that if the majority of the members do not agree with you, that 
you might just be the one that is wrong.
Trust me, if it really were a controversial subject, you would have seen 
more TC members back your position. But they were happy to see the thread 
swing away from your convictions.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070602/23da991e/attachment-0001.pgp