[odf-discuss] Documenting support for ODF 1.1?

Chris Puttick cputtick at gmail.com
Sat Jun 2 02:22:45 EDT 2007


Noise. Contradictory noise.

For example if "when Gary renewed the Foundation membership the last
time he specifically asked if switching to the small corporation
membership as OASIS requested would cause any change in the number of
members the Foundation could sponsor", the answer would correctly be
"no". Because the Foundation was not entitled to have as many members
on the TC as it had.

That is not the same as "OASIS had assured Gary when they asked him to
switch to the small corp. membership that it would not result in any
change in the number of members the Foundation was sponsoring".

Please, if you are making the case that Sun are manipulating the OASIS
organisation and the ODF standard to ensure that no-one else can
implement ODF, then provide evidence. I'd also be interested in
understanding their motive, means and opportunity. And IBM's for
continuing to be involved. And KDE. And Patrick Durusau. Prove your
case.

Chris

On 02/06/07, marbux <marbux at gmail.com> wrote:
>
<snip>



More information about the odf-discuss mailing list