[odf-discuss] Linspire's MOOX initiatives
Daniel Carrera
daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Wed Jul 11 17:09:03 EDT 2007
Christian Einfeldt wrote:
> So to a newbie like me, it seems as if the upside of even broken
> interoperability between ODF and MOOX is greater than the downside.
A lot of people would feel that way. I find it difficult to balance the
pros and cons right now. Your position has a lot of merit.
> And here is a really big thing. If Microsoft is contending that plugins
> break Microsoft Office, doesn't the mere fact that the Sun ODF plugin
> works tend to refute that claim?
Did Microsoft make such a claim? If they did, then your point about the
Sun plugin is right on. I just hadn't heard that before. Are you sure?
> So it makes sense to continue to push for legislation in North America
> and elsewhere requiring ODF, because we will win in some areas; we will
> start debate in other areas; and we will bleed Microsoft of energy and
> cash even in the areas where we lose.
+1
> But IMHO, it might not be a bad
> fall-back idea to have this kind of interoperability that Linspire is
> talking about, even if it is broken anti-interoperability
> interoperability.
I don't know enough to either support or oppose this position. My
concern with the Linspire deal is about the patents part.
> At the same time, I don't think that I am interested in encouraging
> widespread adoption of this broken anti-interoperability
> interoperability, and I am planning on scaling back my advocacy for
> Linspire.
Ask Jean about Ubuntu. Just today she was telling me about how great and
newbie-friendly the latest version is. And Shuttleworth has said that
Canonical will not sign any patent deal with MS. Ubuntu is also Debian
based, and it has a GUI program for installing applications that is
probably not much more difficult than CNR.
> Maybe this broken
> anti-interoperability interoperability MOOX plugin is a step in that
> direction. I really don't know. I wish I did.
It's open source and not tied to MS Office. Maybe we can find uses for
it that MS didn't anticipate. Like having a mail server that
automatically converts any MOOX file to ODF.
> we will see a true digital tipping
> point. Hence the name for our film.
Speaking of which, how is the film coming?
> This goal is what drives me every day. To break the MS business model
> we don't have to hit 51 % market share on the desktop. IMHO, all we
> have to do is hit 20%, and Microsoft's business model begins failing on
> its own, and true competition might then begin to enter the desktop
> consumer retail market even in North America, the most backward region
> on earth.
I think I heard that Firefox recently reached 20% :-D
Cheers,
Daniel.
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list