[odf-discuss] Mass may endorse OXML.

[Thomas Zander]

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 14:32:46 marbux wrote:
> But it fell apart when the big ODF vendors that had been asked by
> Massachusetts to fund the Foundation's development of its plug-in
> declined to do so and Sun refused to modify StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
> so they woud preserve foreign elements and attributes instead of
> destroying them. . (The Foundation's proposal was the only one that
> would have added native ODF support to MS Office or be able to deliver
> high fidelity.)

Its open source; instead of waiting for others to do it (and blaming 
developers that don't think it can be done), try to prove them wrong by 
doing it yourself or hiring someone to do it.

At least, stop whining on this list about it.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070704/6426c963/attachment-0001.pgp