[odf-discuss] Mass may endorse OXML.

[Daniel Carrera]

marbux wrote:
> Too bad the IBM office productivity software execs never got that memo. 
> Rip out and replace is the only option they've given the enterprise 
> market for ODF implementation...
> 
> Governments have largely been awaiting the 
> interoperability tools needed to escape Microsoft's lock-in but the 
> tools have not been forthcoming. And won't be given current attitudes 
> toward interoperability on the ODF TC at OASIS.

We are all aware that you hold a personal grudge with the TC because 
your pet feature was not supported by all the suppliers that actually 
have ODF implementations in the market. Everyone who actually produces 
an ODF application in the market or who has a technical background and 
has chosen to speak has pointed out that your demands are either 
impractical or unnecessary (Thomas, Patrick, Bruce, Alex, Rob, myself 
and others). (Everyone is referred to the archives of the TC list and 
this list.) You are not going to accomplish a lot by jumping up and down 
every time you get a chance. I'm tired. Please stop. Thank you.

Daniel.