[odf-discuss] [Fwd: OOXML]
Alex Hudson
alex at stratagia.co.uk
Fri Jan 26 08:41:24 EST 2007
Pamela Jones wrote:
> You failed to quote the entire letter, which I have in full. It ended
> by saying that the individual hoped to prevent the rushing mistake
> regarding ODF from slipping past them with EOXML.
Obviously, I don't have access to whatever you're looking at, but the
letter I quoted from ends with the paragraph I quoted. If they have set
responses to the points people are making, that's probably even worse.
Whether or not some positive sentiments are offered doesn't detract from
the point: there are many arguments which will not go over well in
different places, and you have to be measured in what you say.
The positive responses I have seen have some where people have focused
less on telling the various committee members how they should do their
job and more on the task at hand. Sending these guys the same e-mails
about how they can't possibly standardise a 6000 page spec. is unlikely
to wash, because chances are that they've figured out how big it is for
themselves and can take a view on that without Joe Sixpack telling them
how to think.
Alex.
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list