[odf-discuss] print problem on Win XP (more info)

[Daniel Carrera]

On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 23:01 -0800, marbux wrote:
> I've never heard anyone complain about having too much documentation,

Actually, in a way, it is possible to have too much documentation. Start
with OXML's 6000-page documentation. I've also complained about OOo's
120-page UNO documentation. Too much documentation can make it hard to
find what you want, and is often a sign that you are not being concise,
clear and relevant, so even when you do find the section you need you
have a hard time figuring out what it says.

> But maybe call it a "FAQ" instead? I think it's a term more people are
> familiar with. Or maybe "Tips & Tricks?"

We already have a FAQ btw.

http://opendocumentfellowship.org/odfviewer/faq

Daniel.
-- English is essentially Anglo-Saxon with all the cool bits taken out.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070112/7becb6b4/attachment-0001.pgp