[odf-discuss] Draft Press Release on OpenDocument Viewer
Lars D. Noodén
lars at umich.edu
Sun Jan 7 09:40:35 EST 2007
Jean, I've made some changes, hopefully improvements.
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> ... http://opendocumentfellowship.org/node/294 ... If anyone can improve
> on this draft, please do! We want to send it out on Monday 8 January.
Given the amount of FUD that is starting to spew out of Redmond in prep
for the Jan. release of MSO, having a press release for the beta and
another for the production version is a good idea.
The recent changes to Google News also seem to make it harder for pro-ODF
articles to get into the news index, and those that do seem to stay for a
shorter time. So pulishing more should be a priority for a few months.
"ODF is about the future," Sutor writes. "Open XML is about the past."
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/software/0,72403-0.html?tw=wn_technology_4
-Lars
Lars Noodén
Ensure access to your data in the future
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Lars D. Noodén wrote:
>>
>> Any reason for Jan 8th ? If we time the press release with the actual
>> release of the viewer, there will be more time to polish it.
>
> I has two reasons. (1) To try to get people to pay attention to the draft.
> I've found that if I don't put a fairly-soon date on a draft, then everyone
> seems to put it in the "I'll look at it later" pile and then never gets back
> to it. :-)
>
> (2) I was under the impression (which I now realise was wrong) that we were
> going to publicise the beta release, not wait until the "version 1" release.
>
> So let's polish the draft.
>
> And perhaps even more importantly, let's compile a list of who to send the
> press release to, when the time comes. I have very few media contacts, I do
> not want to get stuck with the job of developing a list of contacts, I do not
> have a clue how to get a press release into the "system", and to be perfectly
> honest I have very little interest in learning (even to help ODF).
>
> IMO, the Fellowship desperately needs a "press officer" to deal with stuff
> like this, but I am not that person.
>
> Lars, the above rant is not aimed at you personally. Your note just gave me
> the excuse to say it. :-)
>
> --Jean
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>
>
>
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list