[odf-discuss] Microsoft blasts IBM over open document standards
Lars D. Noodén
lars at umich.edu
Sat Feb 17 12:15:35 EST 2007
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Chris Puttick wrote:
> I think Marbux meant ODF - trouble with reading all those uninformed
> articles referring to ODF as OpenOffice format, it starts to rub
I'm not running across those articles, but I would suggest that those who
do find them fire off a short, informative and polite e-mail to the author
or editor suggesting the 'typographical error' be corrected.
I think I had success with that last year when so many where referring to
OpenDocument as OpenDoc. I think I wrote a couple dozen.
It will take a few months to stomp out the problem as articles and article
summaries get distributed and redistributed, but corrections do not.
Ensure access to your data in the future
More information about the odf-discuss