[odf-discuss] Here is Microsoft's spin on the JTC-1 contradictions

[Daniel Carrera]

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 08:11 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > ... In the specific case of ISO, a system that required every member to 
> > review a submission,
> 
> Or count abstentions as neither yes nor no.

That _is_ the current system. An abstention is an abstention.

> Actually, I would expect that abstentions count as abstentions, see choice 
> B below.  That would be +/- 0.  Rather than +1 or -1.

I believe you are confused. This is not a majority vote. Every country
sort of has a veto.

Best,
Daniel.
-- French is essentially Latin spoken by Germans.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070208/9e7cba52/attachment-0001.pgp