[odf-discuss] EOOXML contradicted by the UK

[Daniel Carrera]

On Tue, 2007-06-02 at 23:39 -0500, Russell Ossendryver wrote:
> http://www.computing.co.uk/itweek/news/2173717/open-standards-bodies-call-halt

It bothers me that OFE/ODA get all the press. They didn't do anything.
We all here got Ian's forward from Mike (ie. OFE/ODA) saying "isn't
anyone doing anything?" (uhm... you were supposed to...). All the work
was done by Groklaw and the Fellowship (I can say I was representing the
Fellowship). I don't expect a journo to know that I did anything, but at
least Groklaw should get mentioned. A quote from PJ would have been
appropriate.

Daniel.
-- Germann ist eßentially Dutsch and Englisch with a few Tschanges.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070207/354e744a/attachment-0001.pgp