[odf-discuss] strategy for ODF migration (was: A story of TIFF)

[Daniel Carrera]

On Tue, 2007-06-02 at 03:05 -0800, marbux wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Alex Hudson <alex at stratagia.co.uk> wrote:
> > Like I said before: it doesn't have to be perfect. But it needs to be
> > good. Otherwise, I really don't see the point of ODF.
> 
> I disagree. It does have to be perfect fidelity or so nearly so that
> you're into an acceptable range of data loss.

Misunderstanding: Alex is talking about interop, not fidelity. He is
saying that when you send the file to (say) an OOo user, it is not
necessary that the OOo user read it perfectly, but the rendering should
be *good*.


-- Catalan is essentially bad Spanish mixed with even worse French.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070206/c8128a8c/attachment-0001.pgp