[odf-discuss] strategy for ODF migration (was: A story of TIFF)

Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Tue Feb 6 04:34:41 EST 2007


On Mon, 2007-05-02 at 23:43 +0100, Pamela Jones wrote:
> I agree with Thomas. This "discussion" is hilarious.  I now seriously 
> ask: are you an ODF support group?  All I hear are arguments I'd expect 
> Microsoft to make.

If you do something that Microsoft can abuse, and we warn you about it,
and we explain how MS can abuse it, would that not inevitably mean
reading arguments that you'd expect Microsoft to make? I don't want to
see an MS-ODF, for example, and I don't want people to be more locked
into MS Office after they migrate to ODF. Showing you how these things
can happen is, I think, useful to keep them from happening.

Topic change:

> Microsoft's bid to get its Open XML formats recognised as an 
> international standard faces a delay for at least three months and could 
> fail altogether, it emerged today.
> http://www.computeractive.co.uk/personal-computer-world/news/2174199/microsoft-standards-bid-faces


Yay!


Best wishes,
Daniel.
-- Spanish is essentially bad Italian.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070206/3f3bf838/attachment-0001.pgp


More information about the odf-discuss mailing list