[odf-discuss] strategy for ODF migration (was: A story of TIFF)
Lars D. Noodén
lars at umich.edu
Mon Feb 5 12:16:58 EST 2007
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:
[snip]
> "ODF without extensions" (aka "ODF")
> "ODF with extensions" (aka "ODFX")
>
> as 2 derived classes ? I am open to any other proposals for names ...
[snip]
ODF0?
Hopefully something that somehow makes extensions perceived as
undesirable. They do seem to be a potential obstacle to portability.
The goal, as I see it, would be to encourage standardization rather than
divergence of ODF implementations, especially in applications that can
write data.
The warning I got out of the first message in the thread is that TIFF
ended up with too many variations to be really useful and care must be
taken to encourage convergence now at the beginning of ODF.
-Lars
Lars Noodén
Ensure access to your data in the future
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list