[odf-discuss] strategy for ODF migration (was: A story of TIFF)
zander at kde.org
Sun Feb 4 14:40:00 EST 2007
On Sunday 04 February 2007 19:33, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 19:04 +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > And they _are_ ODF files. Even if they don't fit in your
> > view of open :)
> I disagree with this statement. Suppose you take an OXML document and
> just wrap it around <office:document> tags. That should not be called an
> ODF file.
So you disagree with the sentiment; if I work 4 hours and you work 40 hours,
yet I get more done. Some people will say you worked harder, other people
will say I worked harder.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070204/1a23365d/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the odf-discuss