[odf-discuss] strategy for ODF migration (was: A story of TIFF)

[Thomas Zander]

On Sunday 04 February 2007 19:33, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 19:04 +0100, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > And they _are_ ODF files.  Even if they don't fit in your
> > view of open :)
>
> I disagree with this statement. Suppose you take an OXML document and
> just wrap it around <office:document> tags. That should not be called an
> ODF file.

So you disagree with the sentiment;  if I work 4 hours and you work 40 hours, 
yet I get more done. Some people will say you worked harder, other people 
will say I worked harder.

-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20070204/1a23365d/attachment-0001.pgp