[odf-discuss] Alternative to the Foundation plugin
daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Sun Feb 4 08:46:27 EST 2007
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 11:14 +0000, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> If we feel that the Foundation method (extending ODF) is acceptable,
> then asking Clever Age to extend ODF with OXML is even more so. In
> converse, if we don't feel it's acceptable for Clever Age to extend ODF
> with OXML, then it is less so for the Foundation plugin.
To be clear, this paragraph is the main point of my email.
I think that extending ODF is damaging. What I hope people will get from
my email is:
1. An OXML extension is better than a binary extension.
2. If you agree that an OXML extension is bad, then so is a binary one.
May you live in interesting times.
May people in high places take notice of you.
May all your wishes come true.
-- Chinese curse.
More information about the odf-discuss