[odf-discuss] Request for Public Comment - A study concerning electronic record policy for New York State (RFPC # 122807)

[Chris Puttick]

Sorry about duplicating this thread info - this early in the motning I
very much read and process email in a linear fashion :)

Chris

On 18/12/2007, Christian Einfeldt <einfeldt at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 8:33 AM, Lars Noodén <lars at umich.edu> wrote:
> > Request for Public Comment - A study concerning electronic record policy
> > for New York State (RFPC # 122807)
> >
> > http://www.oft.state.ny.us/oftnews/erecords-study.htm
> >
>
> Hey, we only have until December 28, 2007 to submit public comments, so
> anyone who wants to comment, please do so right away!
>
>  http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=430726
>
> The digg story is here, but I am almost sorry that I dugg it, due to the
> last sentence, which is juvenile, IMHO.  BTW, please let me be really clear
> that I am *not* the person who submitted this digg story:
>
> http://digg.com/microsoft/NY_Govt_Looks_to_ODF_as_an_Alternative_to_Microsoft/
>
> I would like to get people's opinions as to how we should deal with that
> nasty last sentence in that digg story.  Should I undigg myself on that
> story or not?
>
> But it would be nice to get a few votes in the firehose for the /. story.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.com
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>
>
>


-- 
My employers website: http://thehumanjourney.net - opinions in this
email are however very much my own and may not reflect that of my
current employer, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc..

Documents attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format:
http://iso26300.info