[odf-discuss] Two interoperable and independent full
implementations prior to fast-track
Lars Noodén
lars at umich.edu
Sat Aug 25 04:22:36 EDT 2007
The Netherlands' representatives have an interesting suggestion for the
future:
"ISOC.nl recommends that the ISO procedures - and more
specific the Fast Track procedure - be adapted
significantly to better deal with controversial
standards like DIS 29500/Office Open XML in order for
ISO to maintain relevant. This includes demanding two
interoperable and independent full implementations prior
to accepting a submission for a Fast Track procedure."
http://isoc.nl/michiel/nodecisiononOOXML.htm
The current situation, where ISO standards can be apparently purchased
via Ecma, has made a mockery of the standards process and calls into
question the relevance of ISO. Requiring at least two interoperable and
independent full implementations prior to fast-track would prevent a
repeat of the current fiasco.
Regards
-LARS
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list