[odf-discuss] Debate or summary of MOOX vs ODF ?

[Lars D. Noodén]

They're useful, espcially the second one.  The first one uses a bit too 
many subjective judgments.

A question about both is, why abbreviate MS' format as OXML when the 
breakdown of the name Microsoft Office Open XML breaks down naturally into 
the acronym MOOX.

-Lars

Lars Noodén
 	Ensure access to your data in the future
 	http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Daniel Carrera wrote:

> How about this:
>
> http://opendocumentfellowship.org/introduction/odf_vs_oxml
> http://opendocumentfellowship.org/introduction/odf_vs_oxml_part_II
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
>
> On Thu, 2006-07-09 at 09:39 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
>> Which site has a good summary of the MOOX vs ODF debate ?
>> Preference is for an active site, but quality is more important.
>>
>> -Lars
>>
>> Lars Noodén
>>  	Ensure access to your data in the future
>>  	http://opendocumentfellowship.org/about_us/contribute
>> _______________________________________________ odf-discuss mailing list odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>