[odf-discuss] Native ODF support in browsers

[Daniel Carrera]

Yeah I know. I guess that my concern is that we might spend a week
making plans over things that we really have no control over. Think back
to the discussion about the ODF icon. There was a lot of discussions
about how KDE or Gnome should use the icon, and what they'd do with it,
and never an actual contact with the people who make the decisions and
do the work. That's where I'm coming from. Talking to Mozilla is a great
idea.

Cheers,
Daniel.

On Mon, 2006-23-10 at 11:44 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> I'm sure I am writing unclearly today ,too.  We don't make decisions for 
> Mozilla.  We can make a decision to, as an organization, contact the 
> Mozilla Foundation about the idea.
> 
> -Lars
> 
> Lars Nooden (lars at umich.edu)
>  	On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog ...
>  	... until you start barking.
> 
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2006-23-10 at 08:55 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> >> With everyone and their brother pushing to get their plug-in distributed
> >> with FF, what would be convincing reasons for the FF team to take ours
> >> over the others or over a smaller, leaner FF ?
> >>
> >> Who is liaison with FF development or has contact / credibility with the
> >> team ?
> >
> > No one. Which goes back to my very first point when this thread started.
> > We have no power to make this decision.
> >
> >
-- 
"I AM in shape. Round IS a shape."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061023/6400cd9d/attachment-0002.pgp