[odf-discuss] Native ODF support in browsers

[Thomas Zander]

On Monday 23 October 2006 10:52, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > And I agree with Thomas here, we need an use case to
> > justify such a proposal.
>
> More than a case study, you need someone willing to do the work :)
> Otherwise it's just talk. If someone wants to do the work, you don't
> need a use case, they'll do it anyways. If nobody wants to do the work,
> it doesn't matter if you have a perfect use case.

I disagree.
A usecase is needed to know what actually needs to be created and who is the 
target audience.  Not being able to come up with a relevant usecase will 
never make me do any work as its probably irrelevant as soon as its finished. 
(the solution waiting for a problem) and only if there is a good usecase will 
the person who does the work know what to implement as a requirements 
document stems from usecases. Meaning its a good way to avoid the technology 
being totally different then what the proposal was aiming for.

Please see; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_case
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061023/62ec4ee7/attachment-0002.pgp