[odf-discuss] Native ODF support in browsers

[Daniel Carrera]

On Fri, 2006-20-10 at 11:16 +0100, Martin Ellis wrote:
> > Where did I claim that it was more native?
> 
> OK, you didn't.   I thought that you were suggesting that a web 
> browser was 'native display', but that KWord in konqueror 
> was 'plugin'.
> 
> The terms you're using don't seem to fit with my use of them, so I'm 
> left clutching at straws until we find some common ground.

That's what it seems like to me. Let's try this: When Alex says "plugin"
think of the Firefox plugins (I'm sure that's the one Alex is thinking
of too, since that's the one he made).

> I'm getting the impression that this is not a technical distinction
> relevant to KDE that you're making then.

Might not be. Through this discussion I've been thinking more along the
lines of Firefox, not KDE.

Now, how about we end this discussion right here? It's come to the point
where we're just defining words.

> Perhaps it would help if you could explain what use case you want to 
> achieve that is not possible with the current architecture?

Alex never said anything was missing in the KDE architecture. Let's end
this line of discussion please.

Daniel.
-- 
"I AM in shape. Round IS a shape."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061020/3a364690/attachment-0002.pgp