[odf-discuss] Any thoughts on this issue with MS Office 2003 processing of SP-2 XML?

[Pete Harlow]

The ODF link is to OOo...

On 17/10/06, marbux <marbux at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <
> http://www.griffinbrown.co.uk/blog/PermaLink,guid,f19a3daa-6cbe-4621-8add-b64f532c6743.aspx
> >.
>
> "The only fix we've found so far is to save down using a pre-SP2 version
> of Word 2003 - not ideal for organizations which have applied SP2 *en
> masse*. We've begun warning others with similar workflows off applying
> SP2, and continue recommending ODF<http://www.griffinbrown.co.uk/blog/ct.ashx?id=f19a3daa-6cbe-4621-8add-b64f532c6743&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.openoffice.org%2f>instead, as a mature and truly transparent, open standard."
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>
>
>


-- 
Pete Harlow
Catnip Corner - Photography by Pete Harlow - http://www.catnip.co.uk/
OpenDocument Fellowship - http://opendocumentfellowship.org/
Play Ogg Vorbis on your iPod - http://www.rockbox.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061017/156067f1/attachment-0002.htm