[odf-discuss] JOOConverter added to applications list
Daniel Carrera
daniel.carrera at zmsl.com
Sat Nov 25 12:42:51 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-25-11 at 13:18 +0000, Mirko Nasato wrote:
> I appreciate your remark. I doubt that the name can be considered
> offensive by itself, but I'm not native English speaker so if I had your
> suggestion 3 years ago when I started the project I would have taken it
> into account, if not else for "marketing" reasons.
I don't see why this is such a big problem, as long as you don't keep
changing the name. I had never heard of JOOConverter, so I don't imagine
that it's really too late to create a new name. You could keep the old
JOOConverter page for, say, 6 months, and put a link saying
"JOOConverter has been replaced by xyz...".
In the long term, I don't think you want to include a reference to
OpenOffice.org in the product name. I think you want to include a
reference to OpenDocument instead. The sooner you start that process the
better.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
"I AM in shape. Round IS a shape."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061125/de3fbb0d/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the odf-discuss
mailing list