[odf-discuss] Apache2 and ODF (was: 16x16 mime type icons)

[Pete Harlow]

Thomas,

It was *having* attribution that was the problem. The deed says "*
Attribution*. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the
author or licensor." and I suppose it is possible to say "No attribution
required". But I am told many projects shy away from contributions under the
CC licence because of 'attribution creep', the requirement to keep and
manage huge lists of contributors.

On 16/11/06, Thomas Zander <zander at kde.org> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 16 November 2006 13:29, Pete Harlow wrote:
> > IIRC the problem with the CC licence was the one of attribution, and
> with
> > the FSF licences obviously one of using the work in commercial packages.
>
> Did you try the wizard I linked to?
> It allows for attribution.
>
> Not that I think its a smart thing to ask for if your first goal is to
> have a
> big uptake.
> --
> Thomas Zander
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> odf-discuss mailing list
> odf-discuss at opendocumentfellowship.org
> http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.org/mailman/listinfo/odf-discuss
>
>
>
>


-- 
Pete Harlow
Catnip Corner - Photography by Pete Harlow - http://www.catnip.co.uk/
OpenDocument Icons - http://www.catnip.co.uk/opendocument/icons/
OpenDocument Fellowship - http://opendocumentfellowship.org/
Play Ogg Vorbis on your iPod - http://www.rockbox.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/attachments/20061116/178fdf19/attachment-0002.html